Jacobsohn v. Larkey’s Empirical Analysis
245 F. 538 · 1917
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably In re Stanley Engineering Corp. (1947), In re Gil-bern Industries, Inc. (1975)
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pewabic Mining Co. v. Mason · In re Burr Mfg. & Supply Co. · Morrisse v. Inglis · In re Shea · Harris v. The Ruby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule is that mere inadequacy of price is not a sufficient ground for setting aside a judicial sale; but when the inadequacy is so great as in itself to raise a presumption of fraud or to shock the conscience of the court, it becomes gross inadequacy, and is a sufficient ground.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.