Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

245 F.2d 244

Docket No. 12720.

United States v. Arthur E. Herbkersman and Beatrice E. Herbkersman

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-04-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1958

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Haynes v. United States · 133 F. Supp. 495 - Herbkersman v. United States · Iron Eyes v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hugh K. Martin and Richard H. Pennington, Cincinnati, Ohio, H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, and Harlan Pomeroy, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Arthur E. Herbkersman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and STARR, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The judgment of the district court, D.C., 133 F.Supp. 495, is affirmed upon the authority of Haynes v. United States, 353 U.S. 81, 77 S.Ct. 649, 1 L.Ed.2d 671.

/245/f2d/244 · .json · Public domain