Gomez v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
245 F.2d 344 · 1957
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2017
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Frazier v. United States · Kohl v. Lehlback · Raub v. Carpenter · Thomas Queenan v. Territory of Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the objection to a juror relates, not to actual prejudice or other fundamental incompetence, but to a statutory disqualification only, such disqualification is ordinarily waived by a failure to assert it until after verdict, even though the facts which constitute the disqualification were not previously known to the defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court may order two or more indictments * * * to be tried together if the offenses * * * could have been joined in a single indictment * * Rule 13, Fed.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.