Matter of the Application of Otto Eisenhut’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2004
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Kepler · Steverson v. Clark · In re Selmi · In re Swenson · In re Greider
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant cannot claim to be the inventor of a result that would flow naturally from the application of the teachings of the prior art.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.