Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

245 F.2d 871

Docket No. 13141.

Long v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1957.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-06-04

2 counsel of record

Relies on Hicks v. Holland

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1957-06-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1970

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

40195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1No attorney for appellant.

¶2Sumner Canary and Eben H. Cockley, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3Before McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and STARR, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5 The above cause coming on to be heard on the briefs of the parties, and it appearing that the matters set forth in appellant’s motion to vacate sentence were previously decided by the *872district court and affirmed by this court in Long v. United States, 6 Cir., 235 F.2d 183; and it appearing that under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A., § 2255, the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner; and there appearing no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in its determination denying appellant’s motion, and the court being duly advised,

¶6Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.

/245/f2d/871 · .json · Public domain