Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

245 F.2d 97

Docket No. 13046.

Kasper v. Brittain

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-06-01

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1957

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Kasper v. Brittain

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

J. Benjamin Simmons, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Donald B. MacGuineas, Washington, D.C. (W. B. Lewallen, Sidney Davis, Walter E. Fischer, Clinton, Tenn., George Cochran Doub, Warren Olney, III, Warren F. Schwartz, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. John C. Crawford, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellees.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In addition to the appeal in the above cause, for review of a sentence for contempt of court, 6 Cir., 245 F.2d 92. there is also submitted therewith a motion to strike the appearance of attorneys for the United States. Upon consideration of the said motion, it appears from the record that the United States Attorney was invited to participate in the hearing by the District Judge, and that in that capacity he did not represent the Government but represented the appellees. His participation in the case approximated that of an amicus curiae and there is no procedural invalidity in his participation in the case nor any prejudice to the appellant for such assistance to the court as he was able to contribute. Wherefore,

¶2

The motion to strike is overruled.

/245/f2d/97 · .json · Public domain