Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 F.3d 166 - United States v. Juncal

United States v. Juncal’s Empirical Analysis

245 F.3d 166 · 2001

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably United States v. Garcia (2005), United States v. Adams (2006)

12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

260200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. United States · Blackledge v. Allison · Vig v. United States · American Grain Trimmers, Inc. v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · United States v. Maher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is ... commonplace that a defendant will feel “coerced” in the lay sense of the word by an attorney’s recommendation to plead guilty rather than proceed to trial. Such recommendations often come with predictions of almost inevitable conviction at trial followed by a long jail sentence. A feeling of duress is hardly an unusual outcome of such deliberations. Viewed in that light, appellant’s [claim of coercion] seems quite truthful, albeit lacking in valid grounds for withdrawing his plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “carr[y] such a strong presumption of accuracy that a district court does not, absent a substantial reason to find otherwise, abuse its discretion in discrediting later self-serving and contradictory testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We review a district court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for abuse of discretion and any findings of fact in connection with that decision for clear error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.