Richard Merritt & Mary-Jo Merritt v. Shuttle, Inc., U.S. Airways Inc., Terry v. Hallcom, Steven K. Wilson, & United States of America’s Empirical Analysis
245 F.3d 182 · 2001
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 18 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably National Mining Association v. Department of Labor, Sharkey v. Quarantillo (2008)
15 federal appellate · 18 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Indian Towing Company v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson · Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich · City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be read in relation to the Supreme Court’s other statements that, under Section 313(b), a party aggrieved by an administrative order may seek judicial review of the order in the courts of appeals, that the courts of appeals have exclusive jurisdiction to affirm, modify or set aside such orders, and that all objections to such orders must be made in the courts of appeals or not at all. We thus read City of Tacoma as holding that Section 313(b) precludes (i) de novo litigation of issues inhering in a controversy over an administrative order, where one party alleges that it was aggrieved by the order, and (ii) all other modes of judicial review of the order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mokdad v. Lynch“[a]ny order, affirmative or negative, issued by the ... [FAA] Administrator under this chapter ... shall be subject to review by the courts of appeals of the United States or the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upon petition, filed within sixty days after the entry of such order, by any person disclosing a substantial interest in such order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“accept as true all factual allegations in the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in the Plaintiff's favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olivarius v. Mermel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.