Quick v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
245 F.3d 231 · 2001
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2024
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Blum v. Stenson · Sierra Club v. Morton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although extrinsic evidence is admissible to show that a written contract which looks clear is actually ambiguous, perhaps because the parties were using words in a special sense, ... there must be either contractual language on which to hang the label of ambiguous or some yawning void ... that cries out for an implied term. Extrinsic evidence should not be used to add terms to a contract that is plausibly complete without them.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“permitted to become a `free rider' because of the draftsmanship of [the CBA] not because the NLRB erroneously interpreted that clause....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Familiar principles of judicial deference to an administrative agency apply to the NLRB's interpretation of the NLRA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.