In Re the SEARCH OF THE OFFICE OF Ken TYLMAN, Worldwide Financial Services, 913 17th Street, Charleston, IL 61920’s Empirical Analysis
245 F.3d 978 · 2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3114 · 28 U.S.C. § 2072
Relies on United States v. Calandra · United States v. National Dairy Products Corp. · United States v. Stefonek · Kitty's East v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Motion to Return Property. A person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of property may move for the property’s return. The motion must be filed in the district where the property was seized. The court must receive evidence on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion. If it grants the motion, the court must return the property to the movant, but may impose reasonable conditions to protect access to the property and its use in later proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.