In Re Luftman’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1999
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hearn 45 St. Corp. v. Jano · Hulbert v. . Hulbert · White's Bk. of Buffalo v. . Farthing · 44 Misc. 2d 370 - In re Lacaille · Northern Bond & Mortgage Co. v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A creditor may treat a fraudulent conveyance as if it had never been made and immediately attach or levy execution on the property conveyed. Or, as [the first creditor] did, he may first ‘have the conveyance set aside or obligation annulled to the extent necessary to satisfy his claim.’ N.Y. Debtor & Creditor Law, Consol. Laws, c.12, § 278(1). In practice, to pursue the first alternative (which clearly assumes that there is a lien on the property) may be unwise; the property may bring far less than its worth if sold at a judicial sale and with its title clouded by the allegedly fraudulent transfer. Often, therefore, a creditor will elect to proceed ‘in equity’ by voiding the transfer first and thereafter levying on the property.” Luftman, supra, at 725 (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the moment the debtor obtains the realty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.