Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 FSUPP 882 - In re Romanac

In re Romanac’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
January 1989
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1989

6 federal appellate ·

50196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gardner v. State of New Jersey · Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox · Imperial Assur. Co. v. Livingston · Richmond Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. v. Loth · In re Willax

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No suit to enforce any lien perfected under §§ 43-4, 43-5 and 43-7 to 43-10 shall be brought after six months from the time when the memorandum of lien was recorded or after sixty days from the time the building, structure or railroad was completed or the work thereon otherwise terminated, whichever time shall last occur; provided, however, that the filing of a petition to enforce any such lien in any suit wherein such petition may be properly filed shall be regarded as the institution of a suit under this section; and, provided further, that nothing herein shall extend the time within which such lien may be perfected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Bankruptcy proceedings, of course, are not primarily directed to aiding secured creditors, for they are already under such mantle of protection as their security affords. If their lien rights are valid and enforceable when the bankruptcy petition is filed, it is not necessary that they, thereafter, comply with local requirements for filing extensions, renewals, and the like, in order to safeguard their rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “could not enjoin a state proceeding to continue the [statutory] lien as provided for by state law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.