Bullinger v. Trebas’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 2 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 45 U.S.C. § 151 (Railway Labor Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 1501 (Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000) · 7 U.S.C. § 1502
Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Federal Crop Ins Corporation v. Merrill · Gaming Corporation of America v. Dorsey & Whitney Dorsey & Whitney · Holman v. Laulo-Rowe Agency
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.