In re Eletrobras Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“public disclosure documents required by law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“when (as here alleged) the statements were made repeatedly in an effort to reassure the investing about the Company's integrity, a reasonable investor could rely on them as reflective of the true state of affairs at the Company.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“repeated references made specifically in response to damaging media reports about bribery and bid-rigging”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Das v. Rio Tinto PLC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.