Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 GA 881 - Mulligan v. State

Mulligan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1984
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hance v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the sense of serious physical abuse to the victim because eyewitness testimony, supplemented by the autopsy report, indicated that the victim had been repeatedly raped and repeatedly sodomized prior to death. The court also found that this treatment of the victim demonstrated depravity of mind. The court held that 162 the present jury was authorized to find, consistently with the United States Supreme Court's holding in Godfrey that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the murder of the victim was of a type universally condemned by civilized society as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman in that it involved torture or depravity of mind....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.