Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Ill. App. 3d 938 - People v. Donoho

245 Ill. App. 3d 938 - People v. Donoho’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 76 Ill. 2d 289 - People v. Taylor · 123 Ill. 2d 184 - People v. Reddick · 137 Ill. 2d 500 - People v. Thomas · 108 Ill. 2d 182 - People v. Bales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Yes, it was even brought to our attention by the Illinois Supreme Court in á number of cases that *** there should be a better definition to the dwelling house. We are having people prosecuted for residential burglary for breaking into *** unoccupied buildings such as garages. Therefore, very simply, we have redefined dwelling to mean a house, apartment, mobile home, trailer or other living quarters in which at the time of the alleged offense the owners or occupants actually reside in or *** in their absence intend within a reasonable period of time to reside. So that still covers, in my opinion, the vacation home; you intend to reside in that and if you burglarize that, you would still be committing residential burglary, but it tightens up some of these cases where we got old abandoned buildings around our garages and stuff that *** would not be residential burglary. I don’t think there’s any opposition to the bill. I’ll be happy to try to answer any questions.” 84th Ill. Gen. Assem., Senate Proceedings, June 18, 1986, at 66-67 (statements of Senator Sangmeister).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.