TEMPLE v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 1982 · most notably 61 Cal. 2d 466 - People v. Matteson (1964), Hubbard v. State (1974)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Watts v. Indiana · Watts v. State · Epps v. State · Ross v. State · 19 Ill. 2d 156 - The People v. Pelkola
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ . . . “Where improper evidence has been admitted over objection and the trial court subsequently withdraws such evidence from the consideration of the jury, it will be presumed that the error has been cured, unless the contrary is made to appear.” . . .’ Warren v. State (1941), 218 Ind. 378, 380 , 33 N. E. 2d 105 .” Temple v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 21 , 195 N. E. 2d 850, 853 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ward v. State““Under such circumstances, even though there may have been error in the course of the trial with regard to the admission of such evidence or the conduct of the prosecutor, such error will be considered harmless, unless it appears that the asserted error was, in some way, prejudicial to the accused. (Cites omitted).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. England v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.