Davis v. Thiede’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1965
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Prunk v. Indianapolis Redevelopment Commission · Scott v. SCOTT, ADMRX. · Prunk v. Indianapolis Redevelopment Commission · Fechtman v. Stover
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The only question presented is whether or not the trial court erred in certain rulings on the pleadings filed in this cause and in entering the judgment complained of. Those questions can and should be determined by the Appellate Court as there is no constitutional question here that could not be averred in every case that might be decided -in the courts below. Fechtman v. Stover (1963), 244 Ind. 541 , 194 N. E. 2d 623 .” Davis v. Thiede (1964), 245 Ind. 311 , 197 N. E. 2d 173, 174 , 3 Ind. Dec. 169 , 170.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.