State v. Hood’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably State v. Kingsley (1993), State v. Ngan Pham (2006)
6 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Griffith v. Kentucky · Wrenn v. Board of Directors · 42 Cal. 3d 711 - People v. Turner · United States v. Forbes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`is a matter which the trial court may take into consideration in determining whether the prosecutor has a valid and neutral reason for striking the juror.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Arteaga · State v. Poole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.