State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 district · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. McKessor (1990), State v. Nece (2016)
2 district · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Bumper v. North Carolina · Nix v. Williams · Ybarra v. Illinois · Murray v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a criminal action, when the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, the standard of review on appeal is whether ah of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, convinces the appellate court that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellate court looks only to the evidence in favor of the verdict to determine if tire essential elements of a charge are sustained. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Brown, 245 Kan. 604, 614 , 783 P.2d 1278 (1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Myers““[e]xcept as authorized by the uniform controlled substances act, it shall be unlawful for any person to possess or have under such person’s control: ... (3) any hallucinogenic drug designated in subsection (d) of K.S.A. 65-4105 and amendments thereto or designated in subsection (g) of K.S.A. 65-4107 and amendments thereto or designated in subsection (g) of K.S.A. 65-4109 and amendments thereto.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'does not involve any deceit or trickery, but instead accurately informs the individual of his precise legal situation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.