State v. Tittes’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lord Electric Co. v. United States · State v. Hamilton · State v. Webb · State v. Harrold · State v. Haines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the court had, in fact, exercised its discretion, the record does not indicate adequate consideration of the statutory presumption of probation in K.S.A. 21-4606a. The mere reference by the district court to the PSI and adopting its recommendation is not sufficient to overcome the legislative presumption under K.S.A. 21-4606a. It was incumbent upon the district court to fully consider all the circumstances and factors contemplated by K.S.A. 21-4601 and K.S.A.- 21-4606 and, upon denying probation, to indicate in the record those factors the court considered in overcoming the presumption of probation in K.S.A. 21-4606a." (Emphasis added.) 245 Kan. at 715.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Turner““In determining whether to impose the presumptive sentence provided by this section, the court shall consider whether any of the following aggravating circumstances existed: “(b) whether the crime is a crime specified in article 34, 35 or 36 of chapter 21 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.