Landry v. Flaitz’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2024
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hunter Co. v. Shell Oil Co. · Le Blanc v. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. · Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co. · Hardy v. Union Producing Co. · Davis v. Laster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The production required to maintain the lease must be either actual or constructive. It is not actual production here. Lessees, by paying the shut-in royalty prior to the expiration of the primary term, seek thereby to put constructive production into operation effective with the expiration of the primary term and thereby continue the life of their lease. The shut-in clause is specifically designed to enable the lessees to protect their investment in a shut-in well beyond the primary termâ for, at the expiration of the primary term, they can no longer pay delay rentals to maintain the lease and they cannot produce the gas from the well they have discovered where no market is available. Therefore, if it were not for the shut-in clause, and the constructive production resulting from its application, the lease would be forfeited for expiration of its term at the end of the primary term.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. The judgment of the trial court ordering the cancellation of the contested lease is reinstated, affirmed and made the judgment of this court.” 245 La. 223 , 157 So.2d 892 , at page 897.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Landry v. Flaitz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.