Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 MO 579 - Nelson v. Jones

Nelson v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
5
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2002 · most notably Bernheimer Ex Rel. Bernheimer v. First National Bank (1949), Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co. (1943)

8 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

1201912192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maier v. Brock · Johnson v. Johnson's Administrator · Boyer ex rel. McGee v. Dively · Green v. Green · Lincecum v. Lincecum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1" The law requires the best proof the case is susceptible of. . . . Where there is a mass of records to examine, the law does not require the production of certified copies of all of them to prove the negative fact that a certain decree cannot be found. Such proof may rest in parol ex necessitate rei. But there should and could have been furnished the testimony of the custodian of those records, or of other persons who qualified as familiar with them and all of them, in order that the negative fact might be clearly shown. Mr. Ballard testified he examined certain books and indexes. How' did the trial court know they were all of the minute books, record books and indexes? All the trial court knew in that behalf he knew from, what Ballard testified. How could a stranger to the records like Ballard know?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.