Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Mont. 172 - State v. Mazurkiewicz

State v. Mazurkiewicz’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 2 Cal. 3d 619 - Keeler v. Superior Court · 18 Cal. 3d 232 - People v. Walker · State v. Thompson · State v. Krantz · 38 Or. App. 97 - State v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 46-18-242, MCA, clearly states that restitution may be a proper condition of a deferred, suspended or partially suspended sentence. No statute allows restitution requirements to be imposed in the absence of these sentences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.