State v. Black’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Hans v. State (1997), State v. Ommundson (1999)
63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 23 Cal. 3d 412 - People v. Pope · State v. Chapple · United States v. Birges · State v. Perry · Coleman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this case, although defendant originally raised the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, the resolution of such issue required consideration of factual matters not contained in the record thereby making it an inappropriate issue for direct appeal. Section 46-20-701, MCA; State v. Elliott, 221 Mont. 174, 178 , 717 P.2d 572, 575 (1986). Because defendant’s filing failed to meet the requirements of a direct appeal, we appropriately treated such filing as a petition for post-conviction relief, as provided in §§ 46-21-101 to 203, MCA. We then remanded defendant’s claim to the District Court so that an evidentiary hearing could be held that would allow defendant to present those factual matters necessary to his claim. See State v. Laverdure, 212 Mont. 31, 33 , 685 P.2d 375, 376 (1984).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Schoffner“The sexual nature of the assault established a significant connection between the crime and the need for defendant to attend the sexual offender’s program. In order to protect society and to promote rehabilitation of the defendant, the district court properly determined that defendant needed to attend the sexual offender’s program. The sentence was proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ommundson“1) he is `unable to present an adequate appeal because of the delay, or 2) that he will be unable to defend adequately in the event a retrial is ordered.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bone v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.