State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably State v. Bullard (1984), Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd. (2004)
72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. . Smith · LaVecchia v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham · State v. Willard · State v. Ritchie · In Re Humphrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his Court has uniformly held that the competency of a witness to testify as an expert is a question primarily addressed to the court, and his discretion is ordinarily conclusive, that is, unless there be no evidence to support the finding, or unless the judge abuse his discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crocker v. Roethling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.