245 N.C. App. 239 - Peterson v. Dillman’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Sharpe v. Worland · Harris v. Matthews · 73 N.C. App. 331 - Heavner v. Heavner · Ingle v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appeal is interlocutory when noticed from an order entered during the pendency of an action, which does not dispose of the entire case and where the trial court must take further action in order to finally determine the rights of all parties involved in the controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We cannot agree with [the insurer] that its choice to enter the action is tantamount to a duty to defend an insured”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.