Healy v. Langdon’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of Elkhorn (1995), Kocsis v. Harrison (1996)
3 federal appellate · 65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Elias · St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co. · Gall v. Great Western Sugar Co. · Parrish v. Omaha Public Power District · Plambeck v. Union Pacific Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“on this record, it is reasonable to conclude, for statute of limitations purposes, that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Casey was subjected to continuing medical treatment for her previously existing complaints by Levine, Robertson, and Methodist Hospital personnel until her discharge from Methodist Hospital on or about November 20, 1995.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Casey v. Levine“the statute of limitations does not begin to run 'until the act complained of, and any resulting subsequent treatment therefor, is completed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Joyner v. Forney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.