Dike v. Dike’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably In Interest of DW (1996), First National Bank v. Union Insurance (1994)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoch v. Prokop · Phelps v. Phelps · 93 So. 2d 90 - Thompson v. Thompson · Joyce v. Joyce · Chisholm v. Chisholm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“error plainly evident from the record and of such a nature that to leave it uncorrected would result in damage to the integrity, reputation, or fairness of the judicial process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.