245 N.J. Super. 210 - State v. Bernhardt’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Widmaier (1999), State v. Harrison (1992)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Marino v. Ortiz · Kulalani Ltd. v. Corey · Marino v. Ortiz · State v. Tischio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wait for an indefinite period in an attempt to be able to refute a defendant's assertion that although he or she changed his or her mind and consented within a reasonable time, the police improperly disallowed a cure”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Suazo · State v. Bonvie“bright line rule . . . which precludes a defendant from curing a refusal”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`anything substantially short of an unconditional, unequivocal assent to an officer's request that the arrested motorist take the breathalyzer test constitutes a refusal to do so.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.