State v. Grabinski’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 156 N.J. Super. 516 - State v. Gibson · 236 N.J. Super. 298 - State v. Hyman · 235 N.J. Super. 291 - State v. DeChristino · State v. Jensen · Thompson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Law Division judge, in dismissing the violation of probation complaint filed against the defendant, relied upon our statement in DeChristino that “we assume that the preparation of a formal notice of violations and the issuance of a warrant for the probationer’s arrest would constitute the ‘commencement of a probation revocation proceeding’ ____” Id. [ 235 N.J.Super. at 296 , 562 A.2d 236 .] That dictum should not have compelled the judge here to hold that, in addition to the filing of a formal notice of violations during the probationary period, the warrant must also have issued prior to the designated expiration of the probationary period. [Id. at 405, 585 A.2d 979 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.