245 Or. App. 466 - State v. DM’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"the controlling legal principle is that, in order for a trial court to commit a person on the ground that the person is unable to provide for his or her basic needs, the state must present evidence that the person's mental disorder creates an imminent and serious threat to the person's health and safety. In other words, the state must establish the existence of a nonspeculative threat to the person's near-term survival. Evidence that the person suffers from a mental disorder that impairs his or her judgment and has caused discomfort or minor injury is legally insufficient to support a basic needs commitment."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 289 Or. App. 724 - State v. T. W. W. (In re T. W. W.) · 245 Or. App. 553 - State v. MJ

2. “applies in civil commitment hearings in order to protect the strong personal and liberty interests at stake”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 703 - State v. T. M. (In re T. M.) · 289 Or. App. 724 - State v. T. W. W. (In re T. W. W.)

3. “State v. Shorett, 194 Or. App. 587, 595 , 95 P.3d 1146 (2004). They include the needs for water, food, and life-saving medical care. State v. A.M.-M., 236 Or.App. 598, 603 , 238 P.3d 407 (2010) (citation omitted). As we have very recently reiterated,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 245 Or. App. 553 - State v. MJ