Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Pa. Super. 108 - Commonwealth v. Markle

245 Pa. Super. 108 - Commonwealth v. Markle’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1990

20 state decisions

130197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Robson · Commonwealth v. Rankin · Commonwealth v. Portalatin · 229 Pa. Super. 67 - Commonwealth v. Brown · Commonwealth v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The answer given by the witness was not at all responsive to the question asked him. The attorney for the Commonwealth was making no attempt to establish appellant’s connection, whatever it may have been, with Graterford prison or that he had a prior criminal record. There was no probing into appellant’s incarceration there. The immediate curative instruction by the trial judge was in keeping with Commonwealth v. Robson, 461 Pa. 615 , 337 A.2d 573 (1975). There was nothing dramatic or emotionally inflammatory such as might not enable a jury to follow the judge’s instruction to disregard this answer of the witness. Commonwealth v. Brown, 444 Pa. 318 , 282 A.2d 364 (1971). This isolated reference considered in the light of the trial judge’s prompt corrective action could not be said to have prejudiced appellant’s trial. See Commonwealth v. Black, 464 Pa. 604 , 347 A.2d 705 (1975). (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.