Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Pa. Super. 479 - Smith v. Smith

245 Pa. Super. 479 - Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boddie v. Connecticut · Schoepple v. Schoepple · Wilson v. Wilson · 246 Pa. Super. 118 - Tomashefski v. Tomashefski · 224 Pa. Super. 303 - Whitehead v. Whitehead

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prior to the commencement of the action, or at any time during its pendency, upon petition of a party averring his inability to pay all or part of the costs of the action, the court, upon being satisfied of the truth of the averments of the petition, shall enter an order permitting him to proceed upon payment of only those costs which the court finds he is able to pay. Costs include masters’ fees and stenographic charges. The petition must disclose his full financial condition including his income and property. No filing fee shall be required for the filing of the petition. (Emphasis added).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.