Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 So. 2d 682 - Graham v. Eisele

245 So. 2d 682 - Graham v. Eisele’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2013

10 state decisions

4019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Odum v. Morningstar · 232 So. 2d 377 - Rogers v. First National Bank at Winter Park · Rogers v. First National Bank at Winter Park

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rule 1.370 R.C.P., 30 F.S.A. and former Federal Rule 36 require a party to admit or deny any relevant matters of fact set forth in the request as distinguished from conclusions of law. Moore’s Federal Practice, Sec. 36.04(4). Federal Rule 36 was amended in 1970 to liberalize the practice with regard to opinions, conclusions and contentions.” (Italics and footnote omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.