¶1The appellant contends in this case that he was denied and never had a hearing on his petition, pursuant to CrPR 1.850, 33 F. S.A. An examination of the record discloses that he was returned to Dade County and given an evidentiary hearing, but that he was unable to produce the crucial evidence to support his petition. Therefore, the relief sought was denied. We affirm the ruling of the trial court.
¶2Affirmed.