Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 So. 2d 94 - Whitehead v. State

245 So. 2d 94 - Whitehead v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1992

12 state decisions

70197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. State · 172 So. 2d 824 - Hedges v. State · Motley v. State · Croft v. State · 119 So. 2d 400 - Bagley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unnecessarily kill another, either while resisting an attempt by such other person to commit any felony, or to do any other unlawful act, or after such attempt shall have failed... .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A law enforcement officer, or any person whom he has summoned or directed to assist him, need not retreat or desist from efforts to make a lawful arrest because of resistance or threatened resistance to the arrest. He is justified in the use of any force which he reasonably believes to be necessary to defend himself or another from bodily harm while making the arrest or when necessarily committed in retaking felons who have escaped or when necessarily committed in arresting felons fleeting from justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"for our purposes here in deciding whether it is necessary to charge on the omitted subsection, it must be kept in mind that such a charge is necessary not because it may be required to cover evidence supporting it but rather because it defines a material portion of the offense charged. In this context it isn't necessary that it be predicated upon admitted evidence; it is appropriate, indeed mandatory, otherwise." 245 So.2d at 99 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.