Rose v. Skiles’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1988 · most notably 55 Wash. 2d 718 - Dlouhy v. Dlouhy (1960), Brown v. Thomas (1958)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Austin v. Cahill · Shelley v. Nolen · Perez v. Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The judgment of the county court finally disposing of-the cause shall be conclusive of the litigation, and no further appeal shall be allowed, except where the judgment shall be for damages in an amount exceeding one hundred dollars.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stricklin v. Joslin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.