Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 SW2D 177 - Martin v. Kane

Martin v. Kane’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2001

3 state decisions

10195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flinn v. Blakeman · Martin v. Hampton Grocery Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he adverse possession of a grantee may be tacked on to that of his grantor to complete the statutory period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.