Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 SW2D 755 - Hinson v. State

Hinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1954
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. State · Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. State · Lemar v. Garner · Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Tippett · Cross v. Shell Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““John R. Reeves, the surface owner, had no authority to convey any mineral interest to C. W. Hinson, the Relinquishment Act merely constitutes the surface owner the agent of the State, with authority to execute oil and gas leases on the land. * * * Since1 Hinson had no interest in the * * * minerals, the signing of the lease ■* * * was * * * without legal effect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.