Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 SW2D 765 - Elam v. Barrett

Elam v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1969
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Masten v. Masten · Houston Electric Co. v. Potter · Oilmen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defense of the statute of frauds must be interposed by special exception or by special plea or by objection to the testimony. This, the appellant failed to do. Rule 94 * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.