Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 U.S. 192 - Sweet v. Schock

Sweet v. Schock’s Empirical Analysis

245 U.S. 192 · 1917

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 1978
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1978

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

601917192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSchock, Okmulgee County Treasurer v. Sweet

Relationships

Relies on Choate v. Trapp · New Jersey v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * The right or privilege of exemption, from taxation cannot be taken from an al-lottee’s land while he retains the title. Its surrender may not be forced from him, but he may yield it in bargain for another right or privilege; and any improvident estimate of the right to be given up or to be received is guarded against by the requirement of the approval by the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes and the Secretary of the Interior. And it can easily be seen that if exemption from taxation gave value to the land, the power to constitute towns was of greater value. The record shows the value of the lots to plaintiffs in error in the erected town, ranging from $25 to $1,700, a number being valued at $100, others at $200, $300, $400, $1,500. We may observe that Sarah Smith was authorized to sell for not less than $125 an acre.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Sarah Smith invoked a removal of the limitation, the restriction upon alienation, and could only receive the benefit of the law by accepting the consequences of the law. It would indeed have been anomalous to give her the power to erect a town and convey its lots free from taxation.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““That all lands from which restrictions' have been or shall be removed shall be subject to taxation and all other civil burdens as though it were the property of other persons than allottees of the Five Civilized Tribes.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.