Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 U.S. 390 - Jones v. Perkins

Jones v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

245 U.S. 390 · 1918

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably Dennis v. United States (1951), Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co (1927)

55 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

24019181920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedStory v. Perkins

Relationships

Relies on Selective Draft Law Cases · Glasgow v. Moyer · Johnson v. Hoy · Riggins v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that in the absence of exceptional circumstances in criminal cases the regular judicial procedure should be followed and habeas corpus should not be granted in advance of a trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.