Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 245 Wis. 587 - Moss v. Warns

Moss v. Warns’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
7
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2018

19 state decisions

8019441950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Russell v. Ramm · Morgan v. Whatley & Whatley · Braniff v. Baier · Sherwood v. Rosenstein · 62 Cal. App. 108 - Gulart v. Azevedo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]egardless of whether the principal, at the time of his refusal to consummate the transaction, states some grounds or no grounds for such refusal, a particular ground not specified by him at the time is waived and cannot be urged by him when sued [by a broker] for a commission.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . the general rule stated in 12 C. J. S. p. 224, sec. 95, is clearly applicable and controlling herein. It follows, that even if there were discrepancies of such nature as to be substantially at variance with terms in the listing agreement, they must be considered waived because Warns’ refusal to consider the offer was based on solely another ground.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “discrepancies between some of the terms of sale specified in the listing agreement and the terms stated in [the] offer to purchase[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.