Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

246 Ala. 174

19 So.2d 722

Moffitt v. Moffitt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 16, 1944

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1944-11-16

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1951

5 state decisions

Relies on Rawdon v. Rawdon · Johnson v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1944-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THOMAS, Justice.

¶1 The assignment of error challenges the overruling of defendant’s demurrer to the bill of complaint. This is, in effect, an effort seeking to overrule the decision recently announced by this Court in Johnson v. Johnson, 245 Ala. 145, 16 So. 2d 401, 405. That decision is founded on well-considered authorities and will not now be declared erroneous. We are of the opinion, as we have heretofore stated, that the true rule is, that “To preserve the good order of society and to keep the peace of mind of all persons concerned, the nullity of a void marriage should be ascertained' and declared on due application while the facts are available, by a decree of a court of competent jurisdiction.” Johnson v. Johnson, supra; Rawdon v. Rawdon, 28 Ala. 565; Wightman v. Wightman, 4 Johns. Ch., N.Y. 343.

¶2 It results therefore from the foregoing that the decree of the Circuit Court should be and the same is hereby affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and STAKELY, JJ., concur.
/246/ala/174 · .json · Public domain