Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 ARK 92 - Dyer v. Payne

Dyer v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1983

10 state decisions

40196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have said more than once that precedents are of scant value in appeals of this kind. In each case we must study the proof, viewing it most favorably to the appellee, and decide the difficult question whether the verdict is so great as to shock our conscience or to demonstrate passion or prejudice on the part of the jurors. Dyer, at 93.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Nor are we convinced that the jury’s award of excessive damages to [the second plaintiff] for medical expenses necessarily shows that the personal injury award was motivated by passion or prejudice. Dyer, at 94.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.