DP Pham LLC v. Cheadle’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 37 Cal. 3d 591 - Mitchell v. Superior Court · 9 Cal. 4th 1196 - People v. Gionis · 47 Cal. 4th 725 - Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior Court · 5 Cal. 4th 704 - Schnabel v. Superior Court · 38 Cal. 4th 1177 - John B. v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' "Explanatory comments by a law revision commission are persuasive evidence of the intent of the Legislature in subsequently enacting its recommendations into law”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cummings v. Dessel“'may not review the contents of a communication to determine whether the attorney-client privilege protects that communication.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.