Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 F.1d 172 - Ex parte Rush

Ex parte Rush’s Empirical Analysis

246 F. 172 · 1917

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 1955
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1955

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1019171920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Trinidad Coal & Coking Co. · In re Morrissey · United States v. Reaves · In re Miller · Ex parte Dostal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No person under the ago of 21 years shall he enlisted or mustered into tne military service of the United Slates without the written consent of his parents or guardians; provided that such minor has such parents or guardians entitled to his custody and control.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No minor under the age of 16 years * * * shall be enlisted or mustered into the military service.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.