Farrell v. Wysong’s Empirical Analysis
246 F. 281 · 1917
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1968
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hurley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Fisher v. Shropshire · Slide & Spur Gold Mines v. Seymour · Finnell v. Finnell · Fallon v. Worthington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The courts of the United States will enforce grantor’s and vendor’s liens if in harmony with the jurisprudence of the state in which the action is brought.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Powers v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.