Ferretti v. Dulles’s Empirical Analysis
246 F.2d 544 · 1957
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2014
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Wong Kay Suey v. Brownell · Fujii v. Dulles · Yung Jin Teung ex rel. Yung Quock Kew v. Dulles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“claims a right or privilege as a National of the United States and is denied such right or privilege ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whitehead v. Haig
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.